<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Git on Dreamhost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://selenetan.com/2009/10/git-on-dreamhost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://selenetan.com/2009/10/git-on-dreamhost/</link>
	<description>reaching for the moon and sky</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 20:56:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: selene</title>
		<link>http://selenetan.com/2009/10/git-on-dreamhost/comment-page-1/#comment-939</link>
		<dc:creator>selene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 20:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selenetan.com/?p=51#comment-939</guid>
		<description>I do! Mostly it&#039;s for personal messing-around projects where I want to have a remote backup in case of emergency, but the code&#039;s in no shape to be shown to the public. GitHub limits the number of private repositories you can have (free accounts don&#039;t get any). GitHub has a lot more in the way of project management features, like issue tracking, and makes it easier to widely share your code. For small stuff I find it overkill.

Another useful trick is to put your website files under version control and have the live copy be a checkout or export of the repository. You can even set up a server-side hook to immediately update or export the files on push. I used to do this before moving to a CMS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do! Mostly it&#8217;s for personal messing-around projects where I want to have a remote backup in case of emergency, but the code&#8217;s in no shape to be shown to the public. GitHub limits the number of private repositories you can have (free accounts don&#8217;t get any). GitHub has a lot more in the way of project management features, like issue tracking, and makes it easier to widely share your code. For small stuff I find it overkill.</p>
<p>Another useful trick is to put your website files under version control and have the live copy be a checkout or export of the repository. You can even set up a server-side hook to immediately update or export the files on push. I used to do this before moving to a CMS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clint</title>
		<link>http://selenetan.com/2009/10/git-on-dreamhost/comment-page-1/#comment-938</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 20:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selenetan.com/?p=51#comment-938</guid>
		<description>Do you still use them for GIT? Just curious about the difference between doing this and using a service like GITHub.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you still use them for GIT? Just curious about the difference between doing this and using a service like GITHub.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

